Opinion Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the author/producer’s interpretation of facts and data.
I tend to be a late adapter with technology.
Usually, I like to think/hope the latest thing is a passing fad, or an obnoxious invasion, and resist its omnipresence for, say, three to five years longer than makes any practical sense.
If I lived amongst early man, I’d be the guy freezing his tuchus off as the others warmed in front of some new-fangled invention called “fire.”
When the wheel came around, I’d balk at all the unnecessary change.
But I’d also be the guy who, a few years later, became one of the tribe’s vocal wheel enthusiasts.
With all that in mind, I figured I’d try to break my typical cycle and dive into the ChatGPT artificial technology headfirst and relatively early.
Last week I wrote a column about A.I.’s apparent ability to eventually help diagnose Alzheimer’s early.
And while I’m all too aware of the technology’s dangers, including its potential threat to our local news-gathering/writing/publishing profession, I’ve come to believe there’s more to be lost than to be gained by being a reluctant techie in Luddite clothing.
That said, the sweet spot isn’t out with the old and in with the new. Our industry/craft generally does well when it keeps the best principles of the past while embracing cutting-edge innovation.
That’s why, for this week’s column, I decided to interview a chatbot.
All of the below is a real interview I conducted with research lab Open AI’s ChatGPT.
Me: Good morning, ChatGPT. I’d like to ask you a few questions about the state of local news and its future, as it relates to you and your technology.
Bot: Hello! I’m happy to help with any questions you have about local news and technology. Please go ahead and ask your questions and I’ll do my best to provide useful information.
Me: How do you think your technology might impact local news in the next year?
Bot: It’s difficult to predict exactly how language models like me will impact local news in the future, as it will depend on how they are used and adopted by journalists and news organizations. However, it’s possible that language models like me could be used to help automate certain tasks in the news production process, such as fact-checking or generating news articles based on data and other inputs. This could potentially free up journalists to focus on more high-level tasks, such as analysis and investigative reporting.
It’s also possible that language models could be used to generate personalized news recommendations or to improve the accuracy and efficiency of news translation services. However, it’s important to note that language models should be used as a tool to assist and augment human capabilities, rather than replacing them.
Me: OK. Good answer. I’m already getting tight on space for the column I’m writing. Can you give me an exactly 100-word answer to the longer-term impact?
Bot: In the longer term, language models like me could potentially play a larger role in the news production process, potentially taking on more advanced tasks such as summarizing and analyzing large amounts of data, or generating more sophisticated news articles. However, it’s important to note that the use of language models in the news industry will likely be highly dependent on factors such as their level of accuracy and reliability, as well as the ethical considerations surrounding their use. Ultimately, the impact of language models on the future of local news will depend on how they are developed and used.
Me: Wow. You’re quite impressive. Let’s change gears for kicks and to show off what you can do. What’s something interesting you can tell me about Westchester and/or Putnam counties in New York?
Bot: Westchester County is located in the southern portion of the U.S. state of New York, just north of New York City. It is the most populous county in the state of New York, with an estimated population of just over 975,000. Westchester County is home to several important commercial centers, including White Plains, which is the county seat, and Yonkers, which is the fourth most populous city in the state. *(Editorial note: Westchester is not New York’s most populous county, see post script at bottom of this column for related detail).
Putnam County is located in the lower Hudson Valley region of New York, and is part of the New York metropolitan area. It has an estimated population of about 100,000. Putnam County is known for its rolling hills, wooded countryside and numerous parks and recreational areas. The county is home to the Hudson River Valley National Heritage Area, which includes a number of important historical and cultural sites.
Me: You said Westchester County has an estimated population of just over 975,000. But I thought the population was just over a million according to the most recent Census?
Bot: I apologize for the error in my previous response. According to the United States Census Bureau, the population of Westchester County as of the most recent census (2020) is just over a million. I apologize for any confusion my previous response may have caused. Is there anything else I can help with?
Me: Moving on. What are some issues unique to Westchester?
Bot: Some issues that are unique to Westchester County include:
- High property taxes: Westchester has some of the highest property taxes in the country, which can be a burden for residents.
- Traffic congestion: Westchester County is located in the New York metropolitan area, which is known for its heavy traffic. This can be a source of frustration for residents who have to commute to work or other destinations.
- Affordability: The cost of living in Westchester County is high, which can make it difficult for some residents to afford housing, childcare and other necessities.
- School funding: There has been some controversy over the distribution of funding for public schools in Westchester County, with some arguing that certain districts receive more resources than others.
- Environmental issues: Westchester County is located in an area that is vulnerable to storms and other natural disasters, and there are also concerns about pollution and other environmental issues in the region.
Me: What about Putnam?
Bot: Some issues that are unique to Putnam County include:
- Affordability: The cost of living in Putnam County is high, which can make it difficult for some residents to afford housing, childcare, and other necessities.
- Limited public transportation: Putnam County has limited public transportation options, which can make it difficult for residents who do not have access to a car to get around.
- Aging infrastructure: Putnam County has an aging infrastructure, including roads, bridges and other public facilities, which may need repair or replacement in the near future.
- Environmental issues: Putnam County is located in an area that is vulnerable to storms and other natural disasters, and there are also concerns about pollution and other environmental issues in the region.
- Limited job opportunities: Putnam County has a small economy, which can limit job opportunities for residents.
Me: Of all these issues, which should I write about next?
Bot: It’s difficult for me to say which of these issues you should write about next, as it ultimately depends on your personal interests and goals. However, I would recommend doing some additional research and considering which of these issues you feel most passionate about or have the most knowledge about. This can help to ensure that your writing is engaging and informative. Additionally, you may want to consider writing about an issue that is currently receiving a lot of attention or is particularly relevant to the community.
Me: All good points. We’ve been reporting on serious concerns area patients have about Optum Tri-State, the local medical facility formerly known as CareMount. We are hoping more doctors break their silence, allowing us to tell a critical story about the area’s healthcare system. How can our local news organization convince doctors to talk to us about their concerns?…
Bot: There are a few strategies that your local news organization could consider when trying to persuade doctors to speak to you about their concerns…
- Build trust: It may be helpful to establish a rapport with the doctors you are trying to interview, perhaps by meeting with them in person or speaking with them on the phone. This can help to build trust and make the doctors feel more comfortable sharing their experiences with you.
- Offer confidentiality: If the doctors are concerned about possible repercussions for speaking out, you could offer to protect their anonymity by using pseudonyms or withholding their names from your articles.
- Highlight the public interest: You could emphasize the importance of the story and the potential impact it could have on the community, and explain why it is in the public interest for the doctors to speak out.
- Provide legal support: If the doctors are worried about legal issues, you could offer to connect them with a lawyer who can provide advice and representation.
- Offer support: Finally, you could offer to provide the doctors with support and resources to help them cope with any negative consequences that may result from speaking out.
Me: My goodness. That’s incredibly insightful and helpful. I guess humans and robots can possibly coexist in harmony, in life and in journalism.
Bot: I’m glad to have been able to help! I believe that humans and robots can coexist in harmony and work together to achieve common goals. In the field of journalism, for example, robots and artificial intelligence could potentially be used to assist with tasks such as data analysis and fact-checking, freeing up journalists to focus on more creative and investigative work. However, it is important for there to be appropriate safeguards in place to ensure that the use of such technology is ethical and transparent.
Hey, if you can’t beat ‘em, sometimes your best bet is to strategically join ‘em.
E-mail me at firstname.lastname@example.org with any thoughts, whether you’re a doctor or otherwise. And I promise not to reply with A.I. Or at least I’ll tell you if I do.
Further illustrating the role human journalists must play, at least for now, in working with A.I., Examiner Editor-in-Chief Martin Wilbur noticed how ChatGPT incorrectly cited Westchester as New York State’s most populous county, when he edited my column this weekend. (More people reside in both Nassau and Suffolk).
So I returned to the source, providing an opportunity for explanation.
“I can only process and provide information based on the data that I have been trained on,” the chatbot replied, when I asked why it erred. “Sometimes, this information may be incomplete or out of date, which can lead to errors in my responses. I am constantly learning and working to improve my accuracy and understanding, but I may not always get things right.” (It’s also worth noting that the larger New York City “counties” — Kings, Queens and New York County — are usually discussed as boroughs, and have larger populations than Nassau, Suffolk or Westchester).
Anyway, I have to admit, we forgive human reporters for far worse than how the chatbot fumbled. And I screwed up (as a native Long Islander) by not noticing the error before filing the piece.
A.I. might be “just” a tool. But it’s not just another tool.
Using it for good will be up to us.